Re: It's me

["obo" <obo@xxxxxxxx>]

I see nothing wrong with the 'no licenese' required.  Let the 'market'
decide who gets the business.  those that do a good job get the business and
those that don't .......don't.  I believe in the market approach.  I am a
capitalist at heart.  We don't need a bunch of govt yahoos who couldn't make
it in the business world so they went to work for the govt telling us who we
can pay to provide the sevices we need.  Those that provide good service at
a fair price survive and those that don't.........don't survive.  And that
goes for any service as fas I am concerned, doctors, dentists, tax
preparers, hair cutters, you name it.  Still have to follow code or
'acceptable practices' though. Caveat Emptor

"R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6sCdnUlbpfro_ObeRVn-pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> No, I suspect that it means something like..."idiot brigade" or "idiot
> bunch".....
>
> I guess your definition includes me as well. I've been a locksmith for 35
> years and installing alarms for 12 years, and I don't have a single
> license other than a normal business license. Why ? Cause their ain't none
> to get here in Ontario.
>
> Is that right ? Sure as hell isn't ! But on the upside, it does cut out a
> lot of useless government red tape.....
>
> RHC
>
> "obo" <obo@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1UIef.32308$td.22415@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> would that be the 'I'nternational 'B'rotherhood of licensed alarm
>> technicians? of which rlb is not a memeber.
>
>