Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner

[Crash Gordon® <NONE@xxxxxxxx>]

Welp, I ain't got that many...but enough to worry about.


"petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:JOC4e.115472$5A5.1218975@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Our company do the same and we have more then 200k customer..
>=20
>=20
> "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> a =E9crit dans le message de news: =

> DO-dnYURh_rXj8_fRVn-tQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > God that can be a nightmare if you sell em   :/
> >
> > "Crash Gordon=AE" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:qMm4e.97$8o4.660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > I base my lock codes something about the account itself - sorta a
> > formula...cant forget them that way.
> >
> >
> > "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:LLadnSdlRfwqM8zfRVn-1w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Been doing a few change-overs, not take overs.The only bitch has =
been
> >> remembering my damn lock code...I've changed it so many times....
> >>
> >> "Crash Gordon=AE" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:cje4e.7$Qm.790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Doing Radx takeovers heh?
> >>
> >> I've only used 736p once or twice.
> >>
> >> I can't stand the Radx programming anymore..."I" don't have enough =
RAM !
> > :-)
> >> ... plus I'm gettin lazy in me olde age.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:X-qdncO6ZL87iczfRVn-vA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > I've been practicing my 736P interfaces lately....the rest is =
small
> >> > potatoes....
> >> >
> >> > "Crash Gordon=AE" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> > news:Wt_3e.27$A%6.2915@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > me too; 2 x DSC and 1 x Napco this week alone...no one out there =
seems
> > to
> >> > comply to MY requirements either!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> > news:icKdnRk3GvGdzs3fRVn-hQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > I could say the same line of crap about any Manufacturers =
control
> > panel.
> >> > If
> >> > > it wasn't DMP I'd either rip it out, or move on. I seem to be =
ripping
> >> out
> >> > a
> >> > > lot lately....
> >> > >
> >> > > "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> > > news:1112557451.025293.201900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > >
> >> > > Crash Gordon=AE wrote:
> >> > > > Coerce?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Does Ferrari coerce people to buy their product? They're =
exclusive,
> >> > > not anyone can service a Ferrari. I don't buy your argument. If =
you
> >> > > don't want to sell Ferrari don't, sell plain vanilla. My =
clients like
> >> > > the products I sell - 80% of them are Ferrari type consumers - =
the
> > rest
> >> > > I sell plain vanilla to also.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > The products that you refer to as Ferrari products is simply a =
sham
> >> > > that you've bought into and now have to suck your client into, =
to
> >> > > justify you traping them into using it. Those products usually =
don't
> >> > > have any more "useable" features than any other product. The =
simple
> >> > > fact is, it's "exclusive" simply for the fact that it isn't =
used by
> >> > > most dealers, therefore you like to describe it as a positive=20
> >> > > feature,
> >> > > when, in fact it's simply keeping your clients prisoner. You're
> >> > > obviously not going to admit that, but, that's what it winds up =
to=20
> >> > > be,
> >> > > as far as the end user is concerned whether you intend it or =
not.
> >> > >
> >> > > If they all knew that they were trapped into using only your =
product
> >> > > you'd be singing a different tune. Ahhhh, but I'm sure you tell =
them
> >> > > how special they are and deserve to have such a noble product =
line.
> >> > > It's a line, alright .... of BS. And when they decide to change =
to
> >> > > someone else and there's no other company around to take it =
over
> >> > > ....... or they have to pay someone premium prices (because it =
*is*
> >> > > exclusive) to rip it out, because you sold them what you =
describe as=20
> >> > > a
> >> > > Ferrari but is really a dead end product.
> >> > >
> >> > > Come-on Crash, whether you intend it or not, the product is
> >> > > exclusionary. And not quite falls in to the same category as =
Brinks
> > and
> >> > > anyone eles who has a proprietary panel. There's never any =
guarantee
> >> > > that the end user will be able to get, good, economical or even =
ANY
> >> > > service on an exclsive product and there's no way that you can =
argue
> >> > > with that. The part where I see it most is when someone moves =
into a
> >> > > home or business and finds out that the panel they have is
> > ridiculously
> >> > > over priced when service is priced by the "exclusive" dealers =
at 3=20
> >> > > and
> >> > > 4 times the going rate. It's a rip off and if you can't see it
> >> > > ........... they can.
> >> > >
> >> > > At times, I've had shelves full of Radionics and ITI equipment =
that
> >> > > dealers ripped off people with around here. Once they got it
> > installed,
> >> > > service calls were close to $200.00. Gimme a break. Those =
dealers
> >> > > installed them on purpose because they knew that most dealers=20
> >> > > wouldn't
> >> > > kow tow to quotas or spend that money for an exclusive =
programer or
> >> > > whatever the "fee" was, to join the "club". Those companies =
lasted
> >> > > about 5 years and eventually the word got out and most of their
> >> > > equpment wound up in the dump and so did they.
> >> > >
> >> > > You're going to do, say and rationalize whatever it takes, to =
justify
> >> > > what you sell, but the fact remains, it's exclusionary whether =
you=20
> >> > > see
> >> > > it that way or not. It is. And by the way, a Ferrari is =
expensive
> >> > > because it's one of the best cars made, not because someone has =
to
> > meet
> >> > > a quota to get it. That is,  It's not a Volkswagon dressed up =
as a
> >> > > Ferrari.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >=20
>=20
>=20
>