[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner



Our company do the same and we have more then 200k customer..


"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
DO-dnYURh_rXj8_fRVn-tQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> God that can be a nightmare if you sell em   :/
>
> "Crash Gordon®" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:qMm4e.97$8o4.660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I base my lock codes something about the account itself - sorta a
> formula...cant forget them that way.
>
>
> "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:LLadnSdlRfwqM8zfRVn-1w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Been doing a few change-overs, not take overs.The only bitch has been
>> remembering my damn lock code...I've changed it so many times....
>>
>> "Crash Gordon®" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:cje4e.7$Qm.790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Doing Radx takeovers heh?
>>
>> I've only used 736p once or twice.
>>
>> I can't stand the Radx programming anymore..."I" don't have enough RAM !
> :-)
>> ... plus I'm gettin lazy in me olde age.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:X-qdncO6ZL87iczfRVn-vA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > I've been practicing my 736P interfaces lately....the rest is small
>> > potatoes....
>> >
>> > "Crash Gordon®" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:Wt_3e.27$A%6.2915@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > me too; 2 x DSC and 1 x Napco this week alone...no one out there seems
> to
>> > comply to MY requirements either!
>> >
>> >
>> > "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:icKdnRk3GvGdzs3fRVn-hQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > I could say the same line of crap about any Manufacturers control
> panel.
>> > If
>> > > it wasn't DMP I'd either rip it out, or move on. I seem to be ripping
>> out
>> > a
>> > > lot lately....
>> > >
>> > > "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > > news:1112557451.025293.201900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >
>> > > Crash Gordon® wrote:
>> > > > Coerce?
>> > > >
>> > > > Does Ferrari coerce people to buy their product? They're exclusive,
>> > > not anyone can service a Ferrari. I don't buy your argument. If you
>> > > don't want to sell Ferrari don't, sell plain vanilla. My clients like
>> > > the products I sell - 80% of them are Ferrari type consumers - the
> rest
>> > > I sell plain vanilla to also.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > The products that you refer to as Ferrari products is simply a sham
>> > > that you've bought into and now have to suck your client into, to
>> > > justify you traping them into using it. Those products usually don't
>> > > have any more "useable" features than any other product. The simple
>> > > fact is, it's "exclusive" simply for the fact that it isn't used by
>> > > most dealers, therefore you like to describe it as a positive
>> > > feature,
>> > > when, in fact it's simply keeping your clients prisoner. You're
>> > > obviously not going to admit that, but, that's what it winds up to
>> > > be,
>> > > as far as the end user is concerned whether you intend it or not.
>> > >
>> > > If they all knew that they were trapped into using only your product
>> > > you'd be singing a different tune. Ahhhh, but I'm sure you tell them
>> > > how special they are and deserve to have such a noble product line.
>> > > It's a line, alright .... of BS. And when they decide to change to
>> > > someone else and there's no other company around to take it over
>> > > ....... or they have to pay someone premium prices (because it *is*
>> > > exclusive) to rip it out, because you sold them what you describe as
>> > > a
>> > > Ferrari but is really a dead end product.
>> > >
>> > > Come-on Crash, whether you intend it or not, the product is
>> > > exclusionary. And not quite falls in to the same category as Brinks
> and
>> > > anyone eles who has a proprietary panel. There's never any guarantee
>> > > that the end user will be able to get, good, economical or even ANY
>> > > service on an exclsive product and there's no way that you can argue
>> > > with that. The part where I see it most is when someone moves into a
>> > > home or business and finds out that the panel they have is
> ridiculously
>> > > over priced when service is priced by the "exclusive" dealers at 3
>> > > and
>> > > 4 times the going rate. It's a rip off and if you can't see it
>> > > ........... they can.
>> > >
>> > > At times, I've had shelves full of Radionics and ITI equipment that
>> > > dealers ripped off people with around here. Once they got it
> installed,
>> > > service calls were close to $200.00. Gimme a break. Those dealers
>> > > installed them on purpose because they knew that most dealers
>> > > wouldn't
>> > > kow tow to quotas or spend that money for an exclusive programer or
>> > > whatever the "fee" was, to join the "club". Those companies lasted
>> > > about 5 years and eventually the word got out and most of their
>> > > equpment wound up in the dump and so did they.
>> > >
>> > > You're going to do, say and rationalize whatever it takes, to justify
>> > > what you sell, but the fact remains, it's exclusionary whether you
>> > > see
>> > > it that way or not. It is. And by the way, a Ferrari is expensive
>> > > because it's one of the best cars made, not because someone has to
> meet
>> > > a quota to get it. That is,  It's not a Volkswagon dressed up as a
>> > > Ferrari.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home