Re: CADDX NX-6 question from homeowner

[Crash Gordon® <NONE@xxxxxxxx>]

Not really. Lets say you take last 4 digits of the house and increase it =
by one (thats not how i do it) - not so hard. After having a rogue =
employee try something nasty with my accounts a few years back, I lock =
them all with different codes now.=20

The accounts I did sell all had the same lock codes - & they paid me to =
reprogram them all over to them.


"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:DO-dnYURh_rXj8_fRVn-tQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> God that can be a nightmare if you sell em   :/
>=20
> "Crash Gordon=AE" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:qMm4e.97$8o4.660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I base my lock codes something about the account itself - sorta a
> formula...cant forget them that way.
>=20
>=20
> "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:LLadnSdlRfwqM8zfRVn-1w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Been doing a few change-overs, not take overs.The only bitch has =
been
> > remembering my damn lock code...I've changed it so many times....
> >
> > "Crash Gordon=AE" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:cje4e.7$Qm.790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Doing Radx takeovers heh?
> >
> > I've only used 736p once or twice.
> >
> > I can't stand the Radx programming anymore..."I" don't have enough =
RAM !
> :-)
> > ... plus I'm gettin lazy in me olde age.
> >
> >
> >
> > "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:X-qdncO6ZL87iczfRVn-vA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > I've been practicing my 736P interfaces lately....the rest is =
small
> > > potatoes....
> > >
> > > "Crash Gordon=AE" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:Wt_3e.27$A%6.2915@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > me too; 2 x DSC and 1 x Napco this week alone...no one out there =
seems
> to
> > > comply to MY requirements either!
> > >
> > >
> > > "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:icKdnRk3GvGdzs3fRVn-hQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > I could say the same line of crap about any Manufacturers =
control
> panel.
> > > If
> > > > it wasn't DMP I'd either rip it out, or move on. I seem to be =
ripping
> > out
> > > a
> > > > lot lately....
> > > >
> > > > "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > news:1112557451.025293.201900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > Crash Gordon=AE wrote:
> > > > > Coerce?
> > > > >
> > > > > Does Ferrari coerce people to buy their product? They're =
exclusive,
> > > > not anyone can service a Ferrari. I don't buy your argument. If =
you
> > > > don't want to sell Ferrari don't, sell plain vanilla. My clients =
like
> > > > the products I sell - 80% of them are Ferrari type consumers - =
the
> rest
> > > > I sell plain vanilla to also.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The products that you refer to as Ferrari products is simply a =
sham
> > > > that you've bought into and now have to suck your client into, =
to
> > > > justify you traping them into using it. Those products usually =
don't
> > > > have any more "useable" features than any other product. The =
simple
> > > > fact is, it's "exclusive" simply for the fact that it isn't used =
by
> > > > most dealers, therefore you like to describe it as a positive =
feature,
> > > > when, in fact it's simply keeping your clients prisoner. You're
> > > > obviously not going to admit that, but, that's what it winds up =
to be,
> > > > as far as the end user is concerned whether you intend it or =
not.
> > > >
> > > > If they all knew that they were trapped into using only your =
product
> > > > you'd be singing a different tune. Ahhhh, but I'm sure you tell =
them
> > > > how special they are and deserve to have such a noble product =
line.
> > > > It's a line, alright .... of BS. And when they decide to change =
to
> > > > someone else and there's no other company around to take it over
> > > > ....... or they have to pay someone premium prices (because it =
*is*
> > > > exclusive) to rip it out, because you sold them what you =
describe as a
> > > > Ferrari but is really a dead end product.
> > > >
> > > > Come-on Crash, whether you intend it or not, the product is
> > > > exclusionary. And not quite falls in to the same category as =
Brinks
> and
> > > > anyone eles who has a proprietary panel. There's never any =
guarantee
> > > > that the end user will be able to get, good, economical or even =
ANY
> > > > service on an exclsive product and there's no way that you can =
argue
> > > > with that. The part where I see it most is when someone moves =
into a
> > > > home or business and finds out that the panel they have is
> ridiculously
> > > > over priced when service is priced by the "exclusive" dealers at =
3 and
> > > > 4 times the going rate. It's a rip off and if you can't see it
> > > > ........... they can.
> > > >
> > > > At times, I've had shelves full of Radionics and ITI equipment =
that
> > > > dealers ripped off people with around here. Once they got it
> installed,
> > > > service calls were close to $200.00. Gimme a break. Those =
dealers
> > > > installed them on purpose because they knew that most dealers =
wouldn't
> > > > kow tow to quotas or spend that money for an exclusive programer =
or
> > > > whatever the "fee" was, to join the "club". Those companies =
lasted
> > > > about 5 years and eventually the word got out and most of their
> > > > equpment wound up in the dump and so did they.
> > > >
> > > > You're going to do, say and rationalize whatever it takes, to =
justify
> > > > what you sell, but the fact remains, it's exclusionary whether =
you see
> > > > it that way or not. It is. And by the way, a Ferrari is =
expensive
> > > > because it's one of the best cars made, not because someone has =
to
> meet
> > > > a quota to get it. That is,  It's not a Volkswagon dressed up as =
a
> > > > Ferrari.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>=20
>