[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dedicated Z-wave sites?



On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:13:05 -0500, "Robert Green" <ROBERT_GREEN1963@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message  <cJSdnUvB1ri3LBzYnZ2dnUVZ_u63nZ2d@xxxxxxx>:

>"Dean Roddey" <droddey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:jlhgh.24869
>
><stuff snipped>
>
>> I dunno. I think that you are maybe stressing out over something that's
>> not nearly as big an issue as you are thinking. Yes, there are crappy devcie
>> drivers out there. And if you configure a machine with a fairly random set
>> of hardware, you can have problems. OTOH, there are quality products out
>> there that work, and they become known well enough. A machine that is set
>> up with good quality hardware and drivers, which isn't used as a daily use
>> machine (i.e. it's configuration is not changed and web surfing isn't done
>> on it and things that aren't needed are turned off in the OS, i.e. a
>> standard kiosk style touch screen client or a server in the closet) can be
>> stable for years without problems.
>
>That's a lotta futzing and "kid gloving."  It likely means no one will be
>plugging IP cams and ethernet switches into that same network which could
>limit usefulness in a big way, at least in terms of HA.

Bobby,

I don't understand why you would say this. One could kill a network in a variety
of less esoteric ways -- for instance  shorting two wires in the CAT5. What does
this have to do with the stability of an HA server? If (eg) an IP camera breaks
a newtork, the problem is with the camera.

It is conventional IP Best Practice to allocate servers on an at-least-
one-per-function basis. Why should HA servers deviate from what are established
best practices? An HA server is a discrete function. It is sound practice to
allocate at least one CPU to it --  not "kid gloving".

One can over-tax any machine ever built, whether by throughput, CPU cycles or
complexity of simultaneously running software. I can say from practical
experience with several different mini-ITX machines (which you have expressed an
affinity for)  that they can run out of CPU cycles with only a few HA tasks --
trying to also simultaneously run general purpose computing or networking chores
can bring them to their knees long before software interactions become a major
problem.

... Marc
Marc_F_Hult
www.ECOntrol.org


comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home