Re: What is the Gadget Flashing?

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Nov 28, 11:38=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Nov 28, 10:46=A0pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 28, 8:19=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 28, 7:58=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 27, 11:31=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Nov 27, 11:01=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Nov 27, 3:11=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 27, 1:32=A0pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Nov 27, 12:05=A0am, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Mark, you're a fucking instigator from the very start. You =
didn't
> > > > > > > > "mention" a fucking thing. Right off the bat you attack wit=
h your
> > > > > > > > typical snotty degrading attitude. It's just your standard =
routine
> > > > > > > > that eveyone is just suppose to tolerate. =A0There's not an=
 opportunity
> > > > > > > > that you will miss to make a smart ass remark to anyone, fo=
r no reason
> > > > > > > > at all. Some people will take it and some wont.
>
> > > > > > > > The only thing deep seated is the dick up your ass that kee=
ps you in a
> > > > > > > > perpetual bad mood.
>
> > > > > > > > Fuck off.
>
> > > > > > > > > I would say if you look back through this thread you are =
the one here
> > > > > > > > > with issues about restraint, I mentioned questionable ins=
tallation
> > > > > > > > > practices and here you come talking about masturbation an=
d assholes.
>
> > > > > > > > > How about taking some of your own advice and ignore me as=
 I recall
> > > > > > > > > that was once your suggestion a few years ago. You've obv=
iously still
> > > > > > > > > got some deep seated problems going on there-
>
> > > > > > > RHC: And so it continues...RLB are you there?
>
> > > > > > I think RLB's taken up in Jim's body
>
> > > > > RHC; That's what I call a "double dirty" comment....leave it alon=
e
> > > > > will yah.......for crying out loud !!
>
> > > > Funny thing was I didn't mean it that way.
>
> > > RHC: Well then I apologize. I assumed it was another slur against RLB
> > > who is 1- not here to defend himself and 2- not the pariah that
> > > everyone thought he was (my opinion over 10 years of knowing the man)
> > > But we won't go there either....-
>
> > In retrospect I'm sure you will now notice that I have kept all that
> > crap out of this group, because it's over and has no relevent
> > meaning. .... However, with a comment like that.......
>
> > there is no way that anyone can say that he was NOT a pariah to this
> > group. Bass was the most arrogant son of a bitch that I've ever come
> > across. He was a manevolent, malicious, spiteful, vengeful and
> > sinister person ( followed by a 50 more such descriptive words ) who
> > reveled in fostering bedlam wherever he went in Usenet. There's a 15
> > year history of the maliciousness, conflict and outrageous behaviour
> > in this and in other Newsgroups, that is his legacy. That legacy is
> > undeniable by anyone here that witnessed it, who has a timble full of
> > decency in them. Anyone who opposed him and his behaviour did so
> > because of his demeaning and obnoxious attacks and his compulsion to
> > humiliate people. No one just simply attacked him for no reason. The
> > reaction of 99% of the people who opposed him was due to HIS appaling
> > attitude towards people. Those that didn't (outwardly) oppose him only
> > took that stance because there are just some people who will eat
> > anyones shit and grin ..... attempting to put on the big show of
> > appearing to place themselves above the "riff raff rather than having
> > the guts to stand for what's right.
>
> > But, .......... as you say ..... (after you've givenYOUR unsolicited
> > opinion and now I've given mine) ..... we won't go there.
>
> RHC: No we won't; that's your opinion, and I don't agree. He was no
> saint but he wasn't the devil's right hand man either.
> However, if we're going to have a measure of peace here, then maybe
> I'll try to remember how even mentioning his name is like poking you
> in the eye with a sharp stick.
> Lets put him in the same area as any discussion about long term
> contracts... a total waste of time.....:))-

That's BOTH eyes.

and agreed.