Re: One for record

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mar 30, 2:26=A0am, "Robert L Bass" <rob...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Jim" wrote:
>
> > It seems to me that the govenment has no reservation about
> > creating rules. It has lots and lots of rules, laws, guidelines,
> > etc. The problem is that they are "too lazy or too stupid" to
> > do the research to find out if they're really practical, helpful
> > or will do more harm than good.
>
> Well, I agree with you on that one. =A0In particular, I agree after
> what the devastating news I saw tonight. =A0Apparently, the
> insurance industry already found a loophole big enough to
> drive an ambulance through.
>
> I didn't catch the entire report but they *may* have found a
> way to ignore the prohibition on turning away children with
> pre-existing conditions.
>
> It was disgusting watching their lawyer actually gloat, but
> not as disgusting as the thpought that in our haste to get it
> passed me may have allowed them to continue the same
> awful policy.

Gee do you think that would be there had anyone read the bill? And if
I recall that's not a loophole it's stated that coverage wouldn't
begin until 2014.

You gotta quit watching Ed Shultz