Re: One for record

["Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le
message de groupe de discussion : BfBrn.128711$2r7.114943@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 27/03/2010 8:12 PM, Petem wrote:
>>
>> "Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans
>> le message de groupe de discussion :
>> g3Qqn.109479$1n5.19022@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On 24/03/2010 4:00 PM, Petem wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans
>>>> le message de groupe de discussion :
>>>> 5juqn.31312$ao7.12874@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> CFAA (Canadian Fire Alarm Association) has a big shindig happening on
>>>>> May 5. One of the featured seminars is:
>>>>>
>>>>> "The most common testing mistakes made by Technicians performing
>>>>> verifications to ULC S537, and how to perform them successfully",
>>>>> hosted by Mircom Technologies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Damn near fell off my chair.
>>>>
>>>> CFAA is a joke..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Well... If you're a fire alarm technician in Ontario, I don't think
>>> CFAA is a laughing matter. You've got until July to take the upgrade
>>> course or you lose your membership.
>>
>> Yup, in Ontario anyone can install anything.... thats why CFAA was able
>> to have there certification an obligation...
>> But still , it does not make CFAA less of a joke..
>
> I'm all for regulating fire protection technicians.  I also think it's
> important that they stay abreast of the latest developments and I also
> think someone should be Policing their work.  CFAA is not the solution
> however (at least in it's present semi-dysfunctional state).
>

Totally agree with you, here we have regulation, and let me tell you if the
system is not done properly someone can kiss goodbye his spare times for a
long time till the inspector is happy..

But CFAA.. the price they ask for there training is crazy!! and its not even
worth 1/10th of it..