Re: One for record

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Mar 29, 6:28=EF=BF=BDpm, "Rockytsquirrel" <g...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bob =EF=BF=BDlets not forget, =EF=BF=BDNFPA, =EF=BF=BDBOCA etc... =EF=BF=
=BDthey make rules =EF=BF=BDthat the gov.
> adopts without input from the majority of the people it will affect..
> (( all because the gov =EF=BF=BDis too lazy or too stupid =EF=BF=BDto cre=
ate rules for all
> the people.. (imo)))
> RTS
>
It seems to me that the govenment has no reservation about creating
rules. It has lots and lots of rules, laws, guidelines, etc. The
problem is that they are "too lazy or too stupid" to do the research
to find out if they're really practical, helpful or will do more harm
than good. And of course, once the rules are made, chances of them
ever being changed are pretty remote and if so, it takes years and
years to do, at the personal expense of civilians via the courts,
extensive grass roots movements or voting a politician out of office.
Nowdays our national climate seems to be ruled by which ever special
interest group happens to grab the publics attention. And
unfortunately, with the availability of instantanious communication,
the media has control of that. The sheeple only pay attention to
whatever is put under their nose.

For instance, if you only put all the reasons that promote that global
warming is due to the use of fossil fuel, in front of the sheeple,
then that becomes reality. Never put a reason for fossil fuel NOT
being the reason in front of the sheeple, then it's not true.

Likewise, if no one ever brings up the fact that by promoting the
reduction of the world population, and that it would be a giant step
towards being a remedy for reducing the use of fossil fuel, all
natural resouces, help solve the world hunger problems, and reduce
many of the reasons various nations are at war with one another. No
one even thinks about it.

We can't keep increasing the population and then try to remedy that by
creating  "patches" like battery powered cars, nuclear power plants,
CFL bulbs and creating other synthectics , that create other
environmental problems, not to mention the inconveniences. China's at
least got that right. They're on the right track with population
control, as far as I can see. Just give them a few decades and they'll
be out of their adolesence. At the rate we're going, the decisions
that are being made, the special interests groups that the sheeple are
letting lead them wherever they want, I think we're on a one way
track ..... outta town.

Not that I would choose to live anywhere else in the world but it sure
is frustrating to be an American citizen anymore. And I'm sure I
wouldn't want to be living here 100 or so years from now. I don't
picture the US remaining the premier world power it has been for too
many more decades.