Re: Winload question

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mar 22, 6:38=A0pm, G. Morgan <usenet_ab...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >And yet apparently you do, I think I'll stick with what the
> >manufacturers say
>
> And I'll go by what I've personally witnessed during the last 18 years in=
 the
> trade. =A0Every single company I've worked for, subbed for, and every sin=
gle
> installer I've met from other companies use downloading software, period.
>
> That's 100% that I've personally observed, not hearsay from unspecified
> "manufacturers". =A0How many manufacturers have given you that bogus data=
, and
> what are their names?

DSC, GE and Honeywell, is that ok?

It's easy to figure out, take a look at any download software out
there and compare it to any other Windows-based software and tell me
how much effort was put into development?

I love Compass but even the new v2 looks and acts like the old Compass
which still looked old even in the Windows 95 era. DSC looks better
but still old tech, Napco has a horrible interface, Paradox Winload is
a joke I'd say the most modern (and complex) is GE/ITI which isn't
saying much. But like your hero RLB you can believe whatever you want.