Re: Honeywell LYNXR-EN Expansion?

[tourman <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 7, 8:48=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 4:57=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > RHC: Quite right of course...I said all that assuming he was free and
> > clear of any of the horrid "gotchas" that are often hidden in these
> > monitoring contracts through the large companies.=A0However, it also
> > begs the question as to why he would allow himself to be hooked in
> > that way to begin with, when there all sorts of far more "user
> > friendly" companies around.
>
> Perhaps because many times those more "user friendly" small companies
> that you appear to think walk on water are more likely to go out of
> business

RHC: Yeah, and that sounds like standard ADT internal corporate
propaganda!  At least if the client is the customer of one of the
smaller guys, he has a better chance of not being locked into one of
the big company contracts with all their atrocious money grubbing,
restrictive, and limiting terms of service, he can shop elsewhere for
monitoring services. Size has nothing to do with longjevity; even the
dinosaurs eventually went extinct. Hopefully ADT, Brinks and others of
their kind will too.....but likely not before they screw another few
million unwary consumers.