Re: Honeywell LYNXR-EN Expansion?

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 7, 10:39=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 8:48=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 5, 4:57=A0pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > RHC: Quite right of course...I said all that assuming he was free and
> > > clear of any of the horrid "gotchas" that are often hidden in these
> > > monitoring contracts through the large companies.=A0However, it also
> > > begs the question as to why he would allow himself to be hooked in
> > > that way to begin with, when there all sorts of far more "user
> > > friendly" companies around.
>
> > Perhaps because many times those more "user friendly" small companies
> > that you appear to think walk on water are more likely to go out of
> > business
>
> RHC: Yeah, and that sounds like standard ADT internal corporate
> propaganda! =A0

Not at all, look at all the alarm companies in a local phone book and
compare them to what was around 15 years ago, I did that a couple of
years ago and could only find 2 or 3 out of 50

> At least if the client is the customer of one of the
> smaller guys, he has a better chance of not being locked into one of
> the big company contracts with all their atrocious money grubbing,
> restrictive, and limiting terms of service, he can shop elsewhere for
> monitoring services. Size has nothing to do with longjevity; even the
> dinosaurs eventually went extinct. Hopefully ADT, Brinks and others of
> their kind will too.....but likely not before they screw another few
> million unwary consumers.

The large companies don't go extinct, they get bought by larger
companies. Small companies as well, I used to inspect accounts from a
ton of small companies selling out and quitting the business. And I've
seen the same "restrictive" contracts by small companies.

Your hatred of the big guys is becoming irrational.