Re: want to see Bass trying to get out of an argument that he cant win?

[Frank Olson <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

too fat for a ladder wrote:
> On Sep 27, 12:45 pm, Frank Olson
> <use_the_email_li...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> too fat for a ladder wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 25, 10:58 pm, Roger W <alluc...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Sep 25, 9:28 am, Jim Rojas <jro...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Robert L Bass wrote:
>>>>>> "Jim Rojas" wrote:
>>>>>>> You forgot to mention the deaths & class action lawsuits from the $600
>>>>>>> medz...
>>>>>> I'm not aware of any deaths from anti-nausea medications though I
>>>>>> suppose it may have happened.
>>>>>>> The FDA cover ups from tests they never got around to performing on
>>>>>>> real patients, they claim that only the virtual patients suffered any
>>>>>>> side affects of any real concern...
>>>>>> I think the drug companies themselves have to perform the tests, or
>>>>>> sponsor clinical trials.
>>>>>>> The FDA then approving the same drug under a different name as another
>>>>>>> miracle cure...
>>>>>> I'm not big on conspiracy theories concerning the FDA though no doubt
>>>>>> they "looked the other way" much more during the previous administration
>>>>>> than they would dare under Obama's watch.  My father had to deal with
>>>>>> the FDA for many years as a Vice-President at Bristol-Meyers.  He used
>>>>>> to tell us all kinds of stories about the stuff they would do.
>>>>> I was speaking abou the FDA as a whole. It seems drugs approved 5-10
>>>>> years ago now have swarms of ambulance chasers plastering 10 second
>>>>> commercials urging people to file claims again these drug companies. We
>>>>> all know the heart of the problem is the FDA taking these clinical
>>>>> trails at face value. They rush to get things approved, no matter who
>>>>> gets killed along the way.
>>>>> Jim Rojas- Hide quoted text -
>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>> Ambulance chasers are some of my best clients. :-)
>>>> RW <
>>> You sell jogging shoes now?
>>> And where is your opinion on my 2 sites, Roger? Oh what sites? Glad
>>> you asked.
>>> http://www.onlinealarmquotes.com
>>> http://www.alarmquotesonline.com
>> One thing I should mention is that if you're going to be posting
>> material verbatim sourced from other sites, you should first of all seek
>> permission to do so (from the "site owners") and then cite the
>> source(s).  Otherwise you leave yourself open to a complaint for
>> copyright infringement.  I don't think that "fair use" would apply to
>> your obviously commercial site.  If you're going to use "Wiki", perhaps
>> a simple link to the page would be better.
>>
>> Otherwise, I applaud your efforts, Tom, and wish you every success with
>> your new endeavour. <
>
> There's no copyright infringement, Frank.
> Wiki's material, when accurate (a rarity) is fair use.Wiki's material
> comes from anyone and everyone that feels like posting, adding, and
> editing.


I'd suggest you have a quick read of this:

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use

I do know of a fire service company that recently got nailed for
copyright infringement, but they stole pages from competitors (not wiki).