Re: BRINKS HOME SECURITY MAY HAVE DIRECT TIES WITH MADOFF

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 11, 1:35=A0pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 1:00 pm, "Doug" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "mleuck" <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> >news:b43e5d2e-b855-4fce-842d-33fcafe4b174@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
.
> > On Jul 8, 6:35 pm, Jim Rojas <jro...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > alarman wrote:
> > > > Crash Gordon wrote:
> > > >> Hey...saw the "new" Brinks commercial last night...Broadway or
> > > >> whatever they're calling themselves now.
>
> > > > Yeah, the one where she closes the door, bad guy kicks it in, alarm
> > > > sounds,
> > > > C/S calls all within 10 seconds. That one?
>
> > >> Yeah...those sleezy TV commercials basically violates the intention =
of
> > >>CP-01, but Brinks/Broadview/Whatever exist in their own little world
> > >> where rules don't apply to them.
>
> > >> Jim Rojas
> > >Hogwash, the only reason everyone is down on these commercials is
> > >because they are from big bad Brinks. Anybody else doing the same type
> > >of advertising wouldn't have been commented on at all or be
> > >complimented on for the great production values.
>
> > >The fact is they show the mechanics of an alarm and dispatch, it is
> > >neither sleezy or deceptive.
>
> > Hogwash, now thats a word you don't hear very often
>
> > Doug-
>
> I don't know about that. It would seem that the word HOG-wash would be
> quite
> appropriate coming from someone who doesn't know the meaning of sleezy
> or
> deceptive.

No need to bring RLB into this