Re: BRINKS HOME SECURITY MAY HAVE DIRECT TIES WITH MADOFF

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Jul 9, 1:00=EF=BF=BDpm, "Doug" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "mleuck" <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:b43e5d2e-b855-4fce-842d-33fcafe4b174@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Jul 8, 6:35 pm, Jim Rojas <jro...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > alarman wrote:
> > > Crash Gordon wrote:
> > >> Hey...saw the "new" Brinks commercial last night...Broadway or
> > >> whatever they're calling themselves now.
>
> > > Yeah, the one where she closes the door, bad guy kicks it in, alarm
> > > sounds,
> > > C/S calls all within 10 seconds. That one?
>
> >> Yeah...those sleezy TV commercials basically violates the intention of
> >>CP-01, but Brinks/Broadview/Whatever exist in their own little world
> >> where rules don't apply to them.
>
> >> Jim Rojas
> >Hogwash, the only reason everyone is down on these commercials is
> >because they are from big bad Brinks. Anybody else doing the same type
> >of advertising wouldn't have been commented on at all or be
> >complimented on for the great production values.
>
> >The fact is they show the mechanics of an alarm and dispatch, it is
> >neither sleezy or deceptive.
>
> Hogwash, now thats a word you don't hear very often
>
> Doug-

I don't know about that. It would seem that the word HOG-wash would be
quite
appropriate coming from someone who doesn't know the meaning of sleezy
or
deceptive.