[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Takeover standards

Subject: Re: Takeover standards
From: tourman <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:24:13 -0000
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1187198686.735562.181540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7hRwi.61214$_d2.6527@pd7urf3no> <1187269366.739809.291150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4G5xi.63020$_d2.60869@pd7urf3no> <1187316029.517955.41340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Gpwxi.68535$rX4.67382@pd7urf2no> <1187571792.394904.230700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <pmbyi.74117$rX4.45166@pd7urf2no>

Better yet, insist they pay by automatic deduction from a bank
account ! Then there is zero hassle and virtually zero cost !

RHC

On Aug 20, 3:26 am, Frank Olson <Use-the-email-
li...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dunno.  For those that pay for the whole year, I figure I should give
> them something back.  After all, there's a whole lot less hassle involved.

References:
- Takeover standards
  - From: tourman
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: tourman
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: tourman
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: Jim
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: recording soft for panasonic ip camera?
Next by Message: Re: recording soft for panasonic ip camera?
Previous by thread: Re: Takeover standards
Next by thread: Re: Takeover standards
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home