Re: Let's say I break into your house 9, was: Good news for US -- Secure Fence Act of 2006

["Everywhere Man" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx>]

Mark Leuck wrote:
> "Everywhere Man" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1162774772.746105.252430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Mark Leuck wrote:
> > > "Everywhere Man" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:1162770641.714534.295780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > > The country is polarized by radicals. We need a conservative leader
> who
> > > > can unite the country again.
> > >
> > > Who are the radicals Tom? Seems to me they mostly come from the left.
> You
> > > are a fool to think nominating ANYONE from the right will calm these
> morons
> > > you speak of. <
> >
> > If you don't think people like Ann Coulter, Bill Maher, Rush Limbaugh,
> > George Soros, and Michael Moore are radicals then who is a radical in
> > your opinion?
>
> Ann yes, Rush no, the others are all leftys, tell me Tom what the DailyKOS
> and Democratic Underground are?
>
> > > > If conservative Zell Miller ran for President as a Dem against a
> > > > liberal Republican like Lincoln Chafee do you think Republicans would
> > > > cross party lines and vote for Zell?
> > >
> > > I like Zell too but it all depends on who's running as the republican<
> >
> > The republicans will trot out the usual suspects and the dems will
> > nominate Satan's spawn.
>
> And Zell won't run anyway so move on
>
> >
> > > > Do you think Dems would vote for
> > > > Chafee?
> > >
> > > Well he IS after all a republican in name only, it wouldn't bother me
> much
> > > if he got spanked tuesday<
> >
> > It wouldn't bother me if every candidate in every contest suddenly
> > dropped out on Monday either. They are all crooks.
>
> I can see why you like Chafee tho, he's a wishy washy republican like
> Bloomberg <

Wishy washy? Bloomberg does what is right regardless of what side
approves or disapproves. That's what you call a LEADER. What you seem
to be looking for is a FOLLOWER.

>
> > > > We're stuck in a process where billions of dollars are spent trying to
> > > > get people to vote for either an elephant or a donkey. It's time to
> > > > think outside the box because the choices inside the box are not
> > > > looking out for our interests.
> > >
> > > And yet you can only seem to think of Republicans and Democrats to do
> it<
> >
> > Huh? Neither of those parties has anyone looking out for us.
>
> But apparently Bloomberg is different?
>
> >
> > > > I prefer to cast my vote for my country and not circus animals.
> > >
> > > I don't see any circus animals running<
> >
> > Sure you do.
> >
> > > > The country has been hijacked by morons on both sides spending
> billions
> > > > trying to decide if 2 queers should be allowed to call themselves
> > > > husband and husband or Mrs. & Mrs.
> > >
> > > You sound like RLB here<
> >
> > No I sound like somebody who really doesn't care one way or the other
> > about what queers do, just like how I don't care to spend money on
> > abortion clinics. We're too busy trying to decide if GOD wants queers
> > to marry, and less time making sure our senior citizens don't get
> > frozen meals from the Meals on Wheels program.
>
> I don't want "queers" to marry and it has nothing to do with God <

Oh here we go. Now the queers are a drain on the economy too right? As
long as they're not asking you to join their ranks then what the hell
do you care what they do? let the gays marry. Shit I don't care if they
want to marry a garbage can. Just don't waste my money fighting
something that is none of your business in the first place.

> > We're spending money to finance the murder of innocent babies and even
> > more keeping convicted child predators alive. Something is pretty
> > fucked up there wouldn't you agree?
>
> Gee which side is doing that Tom? <

The same side that promotes sexual promiscuity. Hollywood liberals.
Which side makes it impossible for single mothers on welfare to support
the babies that aren't killed?
Which side is trying to block regulating cooking oils to stop obesity
and which side wants everyone to become a fat ass and collect social
security?
Both sides that you see are guilty of wasting my money.
You only see two sides. You see the left as always wrong, and the right
as never wrong.
Caught in the middle are the people who pay for all of this bullshit.
You can take sides be it right or left and point a finger of blame at
the other side but the bottom line is the so called leaders for the
last umpteen years have been slowly sucking the life out of this
country.
Out of every dollar that finds it's way into Washington fifteen cents
makes it's way back out to pay for our programs.


> > You are missing my point across the board. Leave the moral battles to
> > GOD since HE is the one in charge of that stuff and stop spending my
> > money for programs that we have no business financing.
>
> Now you don't want moral battles and just a second ago you did, make up your
> mind <

On one side we have the government. Their job is to manage the NATION.
The separation of church and state is a two way street.
GOD got along just fine before there was ever Air America or the Weekly
Standard.
The government is a business. The business is owned by 300,000,000
million shareholders. Imagine tomorrow if a new manager at Monitronics
decided who you could marry and who you couldn't. If he or she told you
that someone you knew was being fired for being gay. If they said you
can no longer eat chicken unless it was cooked their way. How long
would that manager last before being replaced? Now imagine he tells the
customers who they can marry and who they can't. Mass client exous.
Now why would that manager start poking his or her nose into things
like that when they were only hired to manage the tech department? They
would be out of line for doing stuff like that.
Same thing applies to the government.
We employ the President, Congress, and Supreme Court to manage this
country according to the U.S. Constitution and not by what some
preacher or Hollywood actor says.
Who in the holy hell gave George Bush the right to decide if GOD
approves of stem cell research or not? Where was this man of Faith when
Terry Schiavo was murdered? If George Bush would rather have a job
trying to guess what GOD wants from us I'd suggest he resign and start
lobbying for a job at the Vatican.
We don't employ any of these people to tell us who can marry who. Show
me where in the Bill of Rights it says we have the right to dictate
marriages. Show me where it says we need to fund the murder of innocent
babies? Show me where it says anything about moral decisions needing to
be paid for by the public.
I pay tens upon thousands in taxes because of unconstitutional programs
created by administration after adminstration.
Like I said show me where in the Bill of Rights it gives permission to
fund murdering babies, banning marriages, pay for the Virgin Mary's
poop painting, or the other shit we're paying for.
Show me ONE leader today that respects and abides by the Bill of
Rights.


Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free
state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be
infringed.


Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without
the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be
prescribed by law.


Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in
cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in
actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be
subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or
limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness
against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without
due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use,
without just compensation.


Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a
speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district
wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have
been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature
and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses
against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his
favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.


Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no
fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the
United States, than according to the rules of the common law.


Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor
cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.


Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states
respectively, or to the people.


>  > > > We have radicals fighting over what should or shouldn't be allowed on
> > > > TV. We're spending billions fighting over placement of Christmas
> > > > mangers and Easter Eggs.
> > >
> > > Yea and who's against that Tom? Hello?<
> >
> > The lefties are against it, Mark. The ACLU is against it. The people
> > trying to destroy our country are against it, and WE ARE PAYING FOR IT!
> >
> > > > While I personally don't believe that GOD intended for two members of
> > > > the same sex to wed, and I don't care to see Dennis Franz' ass on my
> > > > local TV station,
> > >
> > > The difference is you can choose not to see Denis Franz's ass whereas
> you
> > > can't stop gays from marrying once the law is implemented.<
> >
> > Who fucking cares if they marry each other? For the love of GOD if
> > every rump ranger in this country was married tomorrow their would be
> > nothing different than how things are today.
> > The founding fathers must be rolling in their graves seeing billions
> > being spent by both sides trying to decide whether queers can legally
> > marry.
> > Who is for it? Again the same lefty clowns like the ACLU but when those
> > opposing it are busted smooching pickles themselves it becomes a joke.
>
> You don't care you do care you don't care etc etc <

The point is we should only be paying into the government for things
approved by the Constitution. If I find something that does not harm
anyone morally unacceptable to me then I should make people who
disagree with me pay for my protest posters?

> > > > I don't recall asking my local representatives to
> > > > waste my money fighting over that when they can't find two nickels to
> > > > spend on education or body armor for our troops.
> > >
> > > I see you swallowed the whole body armor bullshit, you seem to believe a
> lot
> > > of it coming from the left even tho you consider yourself "ultra
> > > conservative" <
> >
> > I just came from the VA hospital and saw results of "body armor". The
> > Dems lie about troops not being issued body armor, and the death toll
> > shows the body armor being issued doesn't work as well as it COULD.
>
> In many instances soldiers didn't wear the armor given to them, it was too
> heavy, everything COULD work better than it does Tom <

And you know this how? You're guessing.

> > Spend some money researching more affective body
> > armor and less money on investigating who is sucking who's dick.
>
> I think they did that already which is why casualties are far less than with
> any conflict to date <

The casualties should be at ZERO but this adminstration is too
concerned with public opinion so they won't drop the nukes.

> > In fact stop issuing the shit completely, withdraw the troops tomorrow,
> > and nuke the whole damn Middle East so we can end this wasting lives
> > and cash when we have the resources to avoid that.
>
> Oh yea that'll fix everything, nuke 100 million people who aren't the bad
> guys <

I'd rather 100 million of theirs buy the farm before one of ours does.
Next time they won't be so Gung Ho when they think about  attacking us.
Are you more concerned about being fair to the enemy than to our
soldiers? Your comment certainly implies that.

> > So how about it? Which of our so-called leaders has the balls to do
> > what should be done to spare American casualties at the expense of
> > public opinion?
> > Kids die every single day because the poll numbers say throwing a nuke
> > would cost people an election.
>
> Who are you gonna nuke? wait never mind <

Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Syria, Sudan, &
Afghanistan should be targets for some nice tactical nukes and if we
have the time lob a few at France just to piss off Pete. Watch the rest
of the world fall in line. Watch how quick people start doing what we
want.

> > Our kids should have to get shot by some terrorist assclown when we
> > have the ability to turn that country into a glow in the dark sandbox?
> > Now who is the liberal? Clinton didn't do it. Bush didn't do it.  Gore,
> > Kerry, and Hillary wouldn't do it. McCain, Rudy G., Jebb Bush, Howard
> > Dean, and anyone else who is toying or has toyed with the notion they'd
> > be great for this country wouldn't do it either.
> > Special interest goofballs in charge of killing our kids.
> > I should have to pay $4 for a gallon of gas because Karl Rove decided
> > ending this war with nukes would cost House seats?
> > It makes me want to puke when I see politicians at funerals for our
> > troops and how brave Johnny was when if the government did it's job
> > Johnny wouldn't be dead.
> > It makes me puke when goofballs like Cindy Sheehan are paraded around
> > denouncing the kids who died because their country doesn't have the
> > balls to do the right thing.
> > So yes I have a real big problem with Democrats and Republicans, and I
> > believe anyone who doesn't have a problem with our kids dying rather
> > than the kids of our enemies is anti-American.
> > Go pull the lever on Tuesday for either an elephant guy or a donkey guy
> > because you've been sold that one side is always right and the other
> > side is always wrong. Tunnel vision when politics is involved is a very
> > dangerous view to have.
> > You might want to readjust your belief that you are a conservative.
> > Conservatism as it is practiced today is radicalism just like
> > liberalism.
>
> Going by this I think you've gone farther right than conservative <

No going by this I am an American.
Stop wasting the taxpayer's money on bullshit and start spending it on
things that actually make life more enjoyable.

Here's a little lesson on Conservatism.
True conservatives want extremely LIMITED government involvement on
social issues. Today's conservatives want the government up our ass and
the liberals want us to pay for the lube.