Re: SurGard MLR2000

["J Barnes" <trishnjames@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

What issues do you have with the SGIII?  We were looking at purchasing one
to use for internet monitoring.  Should I wait a while....

James


"Signalman1968" <signalman1968@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151632332.601866.302680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Mark Leuck wrote:
>
>
>> Your friend must work for ADT then, those receivers are $100,000 each
>
> Well, was it hard to guess? lol
>
>
>> I'm not surprised and it has nothing to do with Tyco, the fact is that is
>> a
>> receiver with an extremely limited audience.
>
> Yea, I agree with you there, my only issue is that DSC, and now along
> with Tyco, has cut the original staff of SurGard that there isn't many
> of them left that even know any of their receivers.
>
>
>>
>> But the SG-III is a platform to improve on, the SG-2000 is a dead-end
>> road
>> technology-wise. Also the SG-III adds Internet monitoring which can't be
>> done on the 2000
>>
>
>
> Again, another point to agree upon, however there are several issues in
> the works as of right now that we have discovered with the SGIII that
> we have themn working on. The bugs of that receiver have definately not
> been worked out as of yet. But the size and price of the design is more
> industry friendly than what the 2k is for sure. I am still totally
> amazed how a company can produce a rcvr with the quality of workmanship
> of the MLR2, and then put out a unit as of the tin box of the 2K.
>
>
>
>>
>> 60 line cabinets and DNIS
>
> Great, glad to hear others are using DNIS also, I have ran into others
> that only use it for line to line, therefore limiting quite a few
> features of the 2k.
>
> We use DNIS from in house switch, then each unit is set to multiple
> platforms here.
>