Re: Caddx/Ademco Downloading

["Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mark's right. No one modem does it all. But a couple come close. So unless
you only work on a handful of panels lines, keep the switch box.

Jim Rojas


"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wfadnUC6_9Ci3uPYnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:GEqfh.4346$GB1.3409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> I got an email from DC that has a lot of helpful hints. I think I'll try
>> them (and yours) and hopefully I can get rid of the selector switch.
>> Thanks again.
>
> You'll never get rid of the selector switch, god knows I've tried
>
>> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:cumfh.22181$%u3.10603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Install DLS3. Install the unsupported modems patch. Then upgrade to
>> > DLS2002. Then all the modems will show up in DLS2002.
>> >
>> > Jim Rojas
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Roland" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:0pmfh.9070$qp1.5706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>I did see that described anywhere. Is that what you are calling the
>> >>Generic 56K? Is that a different generic driver available elsewhere?
> Could
>> >>you give me a hint of where to look?
>> >>
>> >> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> news:J6mfh.10295$yj1.5732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> You will need to install the unsupported modem drivers.
>> >>>
>> >>> Jim Rojas
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> "Roland" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >>> news:c3mfh.8774$qp1.4989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>I looked at the DLS software ( DLS 2002 version 2.0x - the web update
>> >>>>utility says it's the latest) and I didn't see the Hayes 2400.
>> >>>> I saw the:
>> >>>> Generic 56K
>> >>>> Practical Peripheral 1200 Sa External
>> >>>> Stradcom Pocket Modem
>> >>>> US Robotics 56K
>> >>>> Any hints on which of those to use?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >>>> news:2dlfh.10291$yj1.8785@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>> Yes, that is correct. The DL110 emulates the Hayes 2400. I got mine
> to
>> >>>>> work fine on DSC, Napco, Ademco, GE, Caddx, Radionics, plus many
>> >>>>> others.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Jim Rojas
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> "Roland" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >>>>> news:U3lfh.8072$qp1.5396@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>>> You know I have a few of the Bosch modems from DC Security
> Products.
>> >>>>>> I have DSC, Ademco, Napco etc. panels that I download but I use a
>> >>>>>> separate modem for each. I never experimented to see if the Bosch
> (DC
>> >>>>>> Security Products) modem is the exact same or just slightly
> different
>> >>>>>> than the regular DC 110. In any case when I use the wrong software
>> >>>>>> and init string without switching the dial to the right modem it
>> >>>>>> never works. So I know I have been stupid all these years, but
> you're
>> >>>>>> telling me I don't need a separate MD-12 for DSC or CIA (or Hayes)
>> >>>>>> for Ademco (Honeywell) or a Hayes for Napco etc. I can use the DC
> 110
>> >>>>>> for all of them (if I input the correct init string)? Does it work
> on
>> >>>>>> every panel or is it a goofy work around that just works on some
>> >>>>>> panels?
>> >>>>>> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >>>>>> news:Tkifh.10285$yj1.1941@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>>>>I have a few DC Security DL110 modems that work well with Ademco,
>> >>>>>>>Caddx, plus many, many more panels. The modem sells for $275, and
> its
>> >>>>>>>new.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Jim Rojas
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> "Don" <don@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >>>>>>> news:b4ifh.5037$uY1.2709@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> "whppas" <u30140@uwe> wrote in message news:6a9ce516a7a30@xxxxxx
>> >>>>>>>>> Is this modem simular to the old Hayes I was using and I would
>> >>>>>>>>> maybe look on
>> >>>>>>>>> line for it as used.
>> >>>>>>>> si
>> >>>>>>>> doesn't ademco sell a modem that works with compass?
>> >>>>>>>> Isn't there a new special modem made just for this purpose that
>> >>>>>>>> someone was referring to in this newsgroup?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>