Re: Compass Software

[Doug L <vssdoug@xxxxxxx>]

RLB is not the innocent victim that your statements tend to portray him
as, to say he "gets offensive when attacked in the most vicious ways" or
to state that there is an "ongoing battle on this ng between the brick
and mortar dealers and the online dealers" (from a previous post)is
misleading, and doesn't come close to telling the whole story. RLB is a
pariah in the RW, this group and any other group he has infected due to
his spiteful behaviour and actions, not his profession.

RLB answers DIYers question but in the process he invariably attempts to
belittle and to cast the whole industry as dishonest and incompetent,
Jim also helps many DIYers and in the process sometimes attempts to
belittle RLB, tell me whats the difference ?

RLBs attacks on others are no less vicious and spiteful than some of the
flames directed at him,the only real difference being the choice of
language. I find Jims language much less offensive that RLBs
deceitfulness, hypocrisy and outright lies ond certainly less offensive
than the apparent naivety displayed by some regarding RLBs actions.



Doug L


R.H.Campbell wrote:
> No, I don't say RLB's an OK guy, nor do I say he is the monster you say he
> is. I simply don't know; I have never met the man. I judge people on the
> newsgroup by what they say and how they act in relation to answering
> questions etc on security matters. That's all any of us are here for.
>
> I see him answering people's questions in a straightforward way, although
> like all of us, he is not always correct. He gets offensive when attached in
> the most vicious ways by you and others. His motives for being on the
> newsgroup are to help others and to sell his wares to DIY'ers, but at least
> he answers DIY questions without making them feel stupid or belittling them
> for their lack of knowledge.  You on the other hand,often fill the newsgroup
> with hateful, ignorant crap that does nothing to assist anyone here. So when
> it comes right down to it, who's more of a problem here...
>
> To use your own words, "you've proved my opinion of you to be
> accurate...again"
>
> RHC
>
> "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1129609549.429757.137840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>>Mark Leuck wrote:
>>
>>>Why aren't you ragging Crash for not slamming RLB like you do RH
>>>Campbell?
>>
>>Because Campbell actually says that SFB is an OK guy and thinks that
>>it's everybody else who causes the problems.
>>
>>Crash at least knows what's going on, and occasionally let's his
>>opinion be known but (mostly) chooses to stay out of it.
>>
>>But you've proved my opinion of you to be accurate ....... again.
>>
>
>
>