Re: Problem with ADT Security Company

["alarman" <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1130519626.016163.162020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> As long as you continue I'll invoke the SFB ASA rules of engagement.
>
> This is an ALT Newsgroup. You don't control what I or anyone else does
> here. If you don't like it you can leave.

Uh, it seems you should take your own advice.

> When you learn to keep you COMMENTS to yourself and keep your AGENDAS
> out of the group, then I'll do the same. If you want it your way and
> then oppose someone else who does the same, it will continue.

Again, see above.

> All you've got to do is keep it technical, and germain to the groups
> charter and intention.

Or what? You'll stomp and kick and throw a fit?

> NOW ...... on a new note:
>
>  It's quite possible that NOW we can make this group what it was
> intended to be.  Stay within reasonable bounds of what you know the
> intention of this group was, back in the beginning and it'll be really
> nice here. It's possible that SFB will not return. This could be the
> opportunity that all of us has been seeking for a long, long time. If
> you choose to continue this, you can be absoutely sure of one thing
> ...... I won't start it but if you do, I won't just let it go. You
> can't break the rules and expect that someone else isn't allowed to do
> the same. And if someone does break the rules I think that in order to
> keep the group sane, it is incumbant upon the others to come down on
> the offender .... en-masse. If that isn't done, it will become the free
> for all that it has been for years. I'll abide by the "groups" rules
> just as anyone else does. But everyone has got to come to the agreement
> that we're going to keep the group in control as a "group". It's got to
> be quite obvious to everyone at this point, that ignoring instigators
> and disruptors doesn't work. There is a social contract that can be
> reached here. ALT Newsgroup conduct is only a reality if we let it be.
> We've all seen the worst of it here. Can we use this possible
> opportunity to clean up this act and make it what it could be or is
> everyone just going to let it continue to be what SFB made it.
>
> This seems to be a good point to end all of the garbage that has
> existed here.
>
> If there's any agreement here .....maybe someone would like to start a
> new thread so that this can be discussed in a new venue.
>
> Anyone interested in trying to make a new start here?

Who the hell do you think you are, gramps? You don't run anything here but
your mouth. Maybe you should step back and take a good honest look at
yourself. But no, you won't. You never grew up. You're what seventy? You
behave like an eight-year-old. Not many here are willing to take direction
or admonition from you, of all people.
js
js
>