[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?

Subject: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:09:32 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1132962065.435105.236940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <kHNhf.616167$oW2.28416@pd7tw1no> <1133052809.376354.234500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <RHcif.631444$1i.502522@pd7tw2no> <1133133739.076435.226440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2trif.630421$oW2.79862@pd7tw1no> <1133140703.787822.192020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Total nerd" <geekboy0001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1133140703.787822.192020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Good idea, thanks I'll try it.  It's just tough because the range is
> just a silly dial, no markings or anything, just "min" and "max".  I'm
> guessing that midway is half the max range distance (25') but who can
> really tell... I have to set it, pop the face back on, walk to the wall
> and wait, then try to flail my arms.  My wife thinks it's quite amusing
> actually.

Poping the face back on or flailing your arms?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd

References:
- PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd

Prev by Message: Re: Danger - Independent Alarm Dealers
Next by Message: Simon Alarm System - Re-installing
Previous by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Next by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home