[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?

Subject: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
From: Frank Olson <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 06:51:29 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1132962065.435105.236940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <kHNhf.616167$oW2.28416@pd7tw1no> <1133052809.376354.234500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Total nerd wrote:
> That makes sense.  This detector has switches to turn on/off both PIR
> and MW detection.  I have them both on, and turned off the need for two
> trips in succession.  Which begs the question -- how long of a time
> needs to elaps to consider the second detection separate from the first
> detection?
> Not sure which one it is but it sure looks like either an Intellisense
> or maybe a Visonic Duo 220 with lookdown.  I think it's the Visonic.
>

Sounds to me like you have the Visonic Duo 220.  Here are the
installation instructions.
http://www.visonic.com/VisonicHomePage.nsf/sysAllDocuments/2B76FA4F5E4FD29BC2256BFD00214AE7/$FILE/Duo220_Duo220AM_English_Installation_Instructions.pdf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd

References:
- PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd

Prev by Message: Re: Devcon Buys Out Coastal Security, Adelphia, & Guardian
Next by Message: Re: ASA re-visited
Previous by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Next by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home