[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?

Subject: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
From: "Total nerd" <geekboy0001@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Nov 2005 16:53:29 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1132962065.435105.236940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <kHNhf.616167$oW2.28416@pd7tw1no>

That makes sense.  This detector has switches to turn on/off both PIR
and MW detection.  I have them both on, and turned off the need for two
trips in succession.  Which begs the question -- how long of a time
needs to elaps to consider the second detection separate from the first
detection?
Not sure which one it is but it sure looks like either an Intellisense
or maybe a Visonic Duo 220 with lookdown.  I think it's the Visonic.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Frank Olson

References:
- PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: Re: am I a moron?
Next by Message: Fire Alarm installer in SoCal?
Previous by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Next by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home