RE: Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?

["Paul Gordon" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I just use the detection to signal HomeSeer of the event, - then I can
do WTH I like... :-)

Paul G.

-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Paul Gale
Sent: 14 June 2008 08:39
To: UKHA Group
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?

But then you have the problem of getting the tel audio into the VR PC
without comfort interfering...

Paul.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Paul Gordon
> Sent: 14 June 2008 06:49
> To: UKHA Group
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?
>
> One word...
>
> COMFORT
>
> :-)
>
> Does internal off-hook detection (in my house) 100% reliably
>
> Paul G
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Rob Iles
> Sent: 13 June 2008 23:07
> To: UKHA Group
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?
>
> I have looked at this for a semi-related project....turned out to be
> surprisingly difficult to find a modem that recognised "off
hook" on
> the
> internal side (phones). It was complicated by the fact I also wanted
> the
> modem to do caller ID as well, but the off-hook detection was far more
> trouble than I anticipated.
>
> (The project was to integrate telephony into a home automation system
-
> - we
> already had the VR setup, and wanted to be able to dial in and talk to
> it
> remotely - - at some point the "use internal phones too!"
was added).
> never
> did get to the bottom of that one.
>
> R.
>
> 2008/6/13 Vargster <vargster@xxxxxxx>:
>
> >   Have you thought about using an internal phone system?
> > Pick up the nearest phone, dial 1 and say "lights on
please"...
> >
> > Not quite like Star Trek, but a lot more likely to work
reliably...
> >
> > Lee
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:47 PM, jabberwockpl <
> > jaroslaw.michalak@xxxxxxx
> <jaroslaw.michalak%40manutekstura.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Well, it seems that even the higher-end systems have
issues...
> Shure
> > > is for sure out of my reach (and even if it wasn't SWIMBO
would
> > > disapprove), therefore the whole idea is unfeasible.
> > >
> > > Pity, I thought it would be simpler, espcially that my
experiments
> > > with a cheap headset and VR were quite encouraging...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Rob Iles
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> ****       Computers You Carry          ****
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> ****       Computers You Carry          ****
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3186 (20080613) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3186 (20080613) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


------------------------------------