RE: Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?

["Paul Gordon" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

One word...

COMFORT

:-)

Does internal off-hook detection (in my house) 100% reliably

Paul G


-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Rob Iles
Sent: 13 June 2008 23:07
To: UKHA Group
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?

I have looked at this for a semi-related project....turned out to be
surprisingly difficult to find a modem that recognised "off hook"
on the
internal side (phones). It was complicated by the fact I also wanted the
modem to do caller ID as well, but the off-hook detection was far more
trouble than I anticipated.

(The project was to integrate telephony into a home automation system -
- we
already had the VR setup, and wanted to be able to dial in and talk to
it
remotely - - at some point the "use internal phones too!" was
added).
never
did get to the bottom of that one.

R.

2008/6/13 Vargster <vargster@xxxxxxx>:

>   Have you thought about using an internal phone system?
> Pick up the nearest phone, dial 1 and say "lights on
please"...
>
> Not quite like Star Trek, but a lot more likely to work reliably...
>
> Lee
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:47 PM, jabberwockpl <
> jaroslaw.michalak@xxxxxxx
<jaroslaw.michalak%40manutekstura.com>>
> wrote:
>
> > Well, it seems that even the higher-end systems have issues...
Shure
> > is for sure out of my reach (and even if it wasn't SWIMBO would
> > disapprove), therefore the whole idea is unfeasible.
> >
> > Pity, I thought it would be simpler, espcially that my
experiments
> > with a cheap headset and VR were quite encouraging...
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>



--
--
Rob Iles


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------