RE: Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?

["Paul Gale" <groups2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, of course you can send audio over Cat5 - if you just send line
level audio, you may get interference though depending on the run and
length. You could use an audio balun or something like Keith's Kat5 modules
(like I do) which convert the line level audio into a balanced signal which
is great at rejecting noise and interference etc.

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of jabberwockpl
> Sent: 13 June 2008 23:36
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?
>
> I may be totally wrong here, but I do not see much point in wiring
> analog audio cables, when I have CAT5 in every room... Isn't it all I
> need to do is to send audio over the Ethernet?
>
> I came across an interesting suggestion - PulseAudio combined with
> WinESD. If PulseAudio works on Chumby, it will send what it gets from
> Chumby's mic to the main control computer in the living room, which
> will recognize the voice commands from its virtual audio card
> (WinESD). I guess the mic might not be up to the standard, though... I
> hope the bedroom will be quiet enough.
>
> Another solution might be a Bluetooth mic (maybe Jabra SP5050?)
> sending the signal directly to the control PC. I am not sure if the
> range will be sufficient, though.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> ****       Computers You Carry          ****
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3186 (20080613) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3186 (20080613) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


------------------------------------