RE: Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?

["Paul Gale" <groups2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, good point - that would work well.

Paul.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Paul Gordon
> Sent: 14 June 2008 10:10
> To: UKHA Group
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?
>
> I just use the detection to signal HomeSeer of the event, - then I can
> do WTH I like... :-)
>
> Paul G.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Paul Gale
> Sent: 14 June 2008 08:39
> To: UKHA Group
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?
>
> But then you have the problem of getting the tel audio into the VR PC
> without comfort interfering...
>
> Paul.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> > Of Paul Gordon
> > Sent: 14 June 2008 06:49
> > To: UKHA Group
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?
> >
> > One word...
> >
> > COMFORT
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > Does internal off-hook detection (in my house) 100% reliably
> >
> > Paul G
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> > Of Rob Iles
> > Sent: 13 June 2008 23:07
> > To: UKHA Group
> > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: Remote audio for voice recognition?
> >
> > I have looked at this for a semi-related project....turned out to
be
> > surprisingly difficult to find a modem that recognised "off
hook" on
> > the
> > internal side (phones). It was complicated by the fact I also
wanted
> > the
> > modem to do caller ID as well, but the off-hook detection was far
> more
> > trouble than I anticipated.
> >
> > (The project was to integrate telephony into a home automation
system
> -
> > - we
> > already had the VR setup, and wanted to be able to dial in and
talk
> to
> > it
> > remotely - - at some point the "use internal phones
too!" was added).
> > never
> > did get to the bottom of that one.
> >
> > R.
> >
> > 2008/6/13 Vargster <vargster@xxxxxxx>:
> >
> > >   Have you thought about using an internal phone system?
> > > Pick up the nearest phone, dial 1 and say "lights on
please"...
> > >
> > > Not quite like Star Trek, but a lot more likely to work
reliably...
> > >
> > > Lee
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:47 PM, jabberwockpl <
> > > jaroslaw.michalak@xxxxxxx
> > <jaroslaw.michalak%40manutekstura.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, it seems that even the higher-end systems have
issues...
> > Shure
> > > > is for sure out of my reach (and even if it wasn't
SWIMBO would
> > > > disapprove), therefore the whole idea is unfeasible.
> > > >
> > > > Pity, I thought it would be simpler, espcially that my
> experiments
> > > > with a cheap headset and VR were quite encouraging...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Rob Iles
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> > ****       Computers You Carry          ****
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> > ****       Computers You Carry          ****
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus
> > signature database 3186 (20080613) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3186 (20080613) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> ****       Computers You Carry          ****
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> ****       Computers You Carry          ****
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3186 (20080613) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3186 (20080613) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


------------------------------------