[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Insteon open source WAS: Something else

Subject: Re: Insteon open source WAS: Something else
From: sylvan butler <ZsdbUse1+noZs_0609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:00:42 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <slrnegt708.eft.njc@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45127369.160534593@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <slrneh5348.kvr.njc@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45128f9c.167754437@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:41:10 GMT, Dave Houston <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Insteon software, I think they should have listened to us about the license
> terms. I think acceptance would have gone faster had there been lots of busy
> fingers playing with and sharing code. ;)

It DEFINITELY would have sold me some units.  I specifically did not buy
the sdk and etc. because I did not want 1) code was not freely available
and 2) I did not want to be contaminated by restrictive licensing.

sdb
--
Wanted:  Omnibook 800 & accessories, cheap, working or not
sdbuse1 on mailhost bigfoot.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Insteon open source WAS: Something else
  - From: Joerg

References:
- CM11A gets 'stuck' (and fix)
  - From: Neil Cherry
- Re: CM11A gets 'stuck' (and fix)
  - From: Dave Houston
- Re: CM11A gets 'stuck' (and fix)
  - From: Neil Cherry
- Insteon open source WAS: Something else
  - From: Dave Houston

Prev by Message: Re: Using the Sewer Vent for Cable or Cat5e Run?
Next by Message: X10: Others than x10.com doing specials?
Previous by thread: Insteon open source WAS: Something else
Next by thread: Re: Insteon open source WAS: Something else
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home