Re: another major BPL deployment

[Marc F Hult <MFHult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 21 Dec 2005 17:27:59 -0800, w1rfi@xxxxxxxx wrote in message
<1135214879.698686.65260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

>> I think the public record makes it abundantly clear that nothing you have
to
>> say should be given any credence whatsoever.
>
>And your public record of admitting that you haven't read ARRL's web
>page in months, but know all about is credible how?
>
>Dave, it is pretty obvious that you think that you can think about this
>for a few minutes and know all the answers -- a symptom seen by most
>usenet pontificators. I see little benefit to trying to discuss this
>with you, as your insults and profanity are not techniques used by
>reasoned people who want to have a reasonable discussion.  I will
>gladly let my response to "Lee" speak for itself.  Your choice of "ARRL
>experts" is interesting, unless you were trying to be selective in
>finding one other ham that agreed with your general viewpoint.
>
>You have twisted the point of every point I tried to make.
>
>I have spent three years of my life working on this. I serve on IEEE
>industry committees working on EMC and BPL standards, chairing some of
>its study projects and sub committees.
>
>You bring to the table a few minutes of thought about the subject and a
>few insults and profanities.
>
>It is pretty clear that you don't want to discuss this; you want to
>argue and insult and curse like a high-school child.
>
>I wish you well. I shall not trouble you again or contradict the
>authority you have tried to establish on this NG.
>
>And I sure understand why you noted that some of the other Amateurs who
>posted here argued with you. :-)
>
>Ed


Ed,