Re: Moose/Sentol

["Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

"tourman" <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de groupe de
discussion :
e484fe50-e094-4794-bdda-54e9394628dd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Sep 27, 5:17 pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sep 27, 12:56 pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 27, 9:30 am, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Sep 26, 3:07 pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > > > On Sep 26, 12:19 am, Nicholas Markowicz <nmarkowic...@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> > >  I guess the saying is true .... If you tell a lie often
>>
>> > > > enough, it eventually becomes the truth.
>>
>> > > RHC: Hey !! That's how the gun haters manage to pass laws didn't you
>> > > know. That's how they managed to dupe the public into keeping the
>> > > long
>> > > gun registry up here in Canada.
>>
>> > I just read something about the registry up your way. Isn't it up for
>> > a final vote. Or did that happen already?
>>
>> That is ..... final vote to do away with the registry.
>
> RHC: No, the Private Members bill to do away with the long gun
> registry was NOT passed. A lot of back room arm twisting by the
> Liberals (Democrats), and a lot of lies by the anti-gunner groups,
> misrepresentation of statistics, loads of tearful pleas by the
> relations of the women shot during the Dawson college massacre, turned
> enough gutless  MP's to keep the registry 153 votes to 151.
>
> I've never seen such a miserable display of lies, misrepresented
> statistics, and partisan politics in my life. This has only
> strengthened the resolve of gun owners to make a major election issue
> of this next time around. The Conservative government (like your
> Republicans) is firm in their resolve to get rid of this "white
> elephant" but it may or may not happen after the next election. If the
> Conservatives get in with a majority government, they will have the
> voting power to get rid of it for good. If the left wing Liberals get
> in, not only will we have the continuation of this very dangerous
> piece of legislation , but they have sworn to ban all handguns and
> semi-automatic firearms as well (the lack of real logic on this simply
> boggles the mind....)
>
> The long gun registry is ONLY there to ensure that some future
> government will have the ultimate ability to ban all firearms from the
> hands of law abiding people !! This is one of the stated goals of the
> UN. The anti-gunners are not intellectually honest enough to admit
> this, but I've been in this business long enough to know it's true.
> And even if it weren't their intent, why would politicians leave gun
> owners in a position where some future government can do this on a
> whim.
>
> Look at England and Australia if you don't believe confiscation CAN
> happen. Politicians simply can't be trusted to vote with reason when
> emotion sways voters right or wrong. The Conservative government will
> now have millions of gun owners voting for them, and raising funds for
> them, based on this issue alone. I, like millions of other gun owners,
> am now a criminal by dint of the fact that my paperwork is not
> complete, and all my firearms are now subject to confiscation with no
> compensation whatsoever, AND the police have the legal power to enter
> my home WITHOUT A WARRANT on suspicion only that there are
> unregistered firearms present.
>
> Any one who doesn't see this as dangerous legislation is simply an
> idiot !!

I am a hunter that have guns.. and I dont care about the registry...

there is no reason to fear it.. but I know that the problem here is not with
the long guns, its with the owner, and having a registry of the OWNER of
long guns is not useless..