[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ping Tourman...Paradox IP100



On May 12, 5:36=A0pm, "Pogo" <No_spam_marc@nospam> wrote:
> Thanks, I have been chasing Security 24 for the last 4 days trying to get=
 a
> clear answer. They have the I/P receivers on-line but are only testing
> them...not sure if they will embrace it or pass up on that segment of the
> business. Yes, at the moment I also use Uplink though it does not allow f=
or
> panel/user updates which I have a need of.
> Again, thanks for your input!
>
> "tourman" <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:8e06548e-4845-4533-8473-86dfa918c685@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On May 11, 9:49 pm, "Pogo" <No_spam_marc@nospam> wrote:
>
> > Anyone use this IP interface, any thoughts.
> > I try to use Paradox panels whenever I can thought I have not tried the=
re
> > IP100 interface in any of our configurations with and was looking for s=
ome
> > feedback. Is this unit cumbersome to enroll ..some of the litterature a=
nd
> > bloggs indicate its problematic. Also, it look favourable till I call m=
y
> > central station and they tell me they do not have an appropriate receiv=
er.
> > Yes Paradox claims that they do! Would like to keep the monitoring with=
in
> > Ontario if I could.. any local dealers in Ontario using this IP100 unit
> > and
> > with which central?
>
> RHC: I have no experience with the IP module from Paradox, nor from
> any other supplier for that matter. I have heard it works as well as
> expected, but this is third hand information. I only use Uplink
> cellular myself, because my station refuse to allow the cheaper IP
> modules on their station (of which I understand this is one).
>
> Sorry I cant be of more assistance

RHC: Yes, Security 24 (Reliance/Protectron) are being very cautious
about a lot of these new methods of alarm transmission. I have been
told that the only IP module they will accept on the station costs
about $1000, so is of little use to dealers. VoIP is another
problematic situation, and rightly so.

Time and technology is moving on; however, I feel better about dealing
with a station that is very cautious about letting things on the
station unless they are very sure they work properly. Personally, I
think that is the correct approach. Security services HAVE to work
when they are called upon. It's not all about the money with the
better companies.....


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home