[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ping: Petem

Subject: Re: Ping: Petem
From: Frank Olson <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:25:55 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <hhlj42$d4h$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a52de951-bb31-47fa-a78d-bccbc3325014@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_Gs%m.521$rH7.64@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <ff385c0e-7b40-4e4e-89cd-b8bddab3fbf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <HVw%m.281$Sh7.20@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <59131e20-49cf-44cd-a4e4-a8cb4e81d1e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <D3z%m.3858$Gf3.2149@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <7992a8c3-55a9-4f58-916d-caf0a6252eac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <tfitj5dhag23vtppmpmtr9kvpagk2bo2i0@xxxxxxx> <107703c1-e50e-484b-b05e-b602e2b95115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <%9L%m.13604$0U1.1475@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

alarman wrote:
> tourman wrote:
>> RHC: You're right ! Here I am letting this thread degenerate into the
>> usual pissing contest. It's just that Jack gets my goat with his
>> picking apart every little thing that is said and proceeding to take
>> what he chooses of it out of context...
>
> Keep your goat. I have plenty already.


Funny...  You don't look Greek.  :-)

References:
- Re: Ping: Petem
  - From: Petem
- Re: Ping: Petem
  - From: tourman
- Re: Ping: Petem
  - From: alarman
- Re: Ping: Petem
  - From: tourman
- Re: Ping: Petem
  - From: alarman
- Re: Ping: Petem
  - From: tourman
- Re: Ping: Petem
  - From: alarman
- Re: Ping: Petem
  - From: tourman
- Re: Ping: Petem
  - From: G . Morgan
- Re: Ping: Petem
  - From: tourman
- Re: Ping: Petem
  - From: alarman

Prev by Message: Re: wiegand data interference
Next by Message: Re: using CAT5 for smoke detectors
Previous by thread: Re: Ping: Petem
Next by thread: Re: Ping: Petem
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home