[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sell LCD telephone Burglar Alarm Systems



On Jun 25, 3:34=A0pm, G. Morgan <usenet_ab...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> mleuck wrote:
> >Maybe because it hasn't been proven with irrefutable evidence, I've
> >dealt with several of the ITI version recessed sensors when they first
> >came out so I doubt I'd ever ask someone else how well they work.
>
> Okay then, what explanation do you have for the post in question? =A0Is i=
t a
> very well done forgery?
>
> >You seem more than barely interested
>
> I am more interested in the thought process a person like you has. =A0It'=
s hard
> to imagine someone blatantly lying & denying while faced with hard eviden=
ce.
> It's mostly curiosity regarding the psychology behind your deception, not=
 the
> content of the lie itself.

Fingerprints on a murder weapon is hard evidence
Your DNA on a dead body is hard evidence

A copied text file or link to a web post isn't hard evidence, if you
really want to examine bizarre thought processes start with your own

> >> Back in the day, if the target was 'you-know-who', this incident would=
 be
> >> tantamount to the Kennedy assassination/conspiracy.
>
> >And if I recall you and Frank were at the head of the pack at that
> >kind of stuff
>
> Yeah. =A0

At least we agree on that



alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home