Re: home alarm system?

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Jun 24, 11:44=EF=BF=BDam, "Bob La Londe" <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Actually while they did not establish a good quality precedent to use in
> future court cases I suspect that a number of people here have been
> intimidated by their bullying tactics.-


Actually all of what they did, provides me with a little porfolio of
information which I will freely show to anyone who even considers
watching a Brinks commercial on TV.  Anytime a prospect mentions the
TV adds, I bring out some of the posts that were made here and show
them what kind of companys advertise on TV. I use them as a prime
example of how they are going to be screwed and how willing they are
to protect their right to screw people who are dumb enough to sign
their agreements.

That is, if Brinks is picky enough to go after a little guy down in
Florida who sells their old discarded equipment because it's leased to
all of their customers, just imagine what they'd do to the customer
who decided they didn't like the service they were getting from them.

I feel bad that it was at the expense of Jim, but that was beyond my
control and I think everyone else in the industry should benefit from
it as much as possible.

I have and as far as I can tell, no customer that I've shown the
information to has gone with Brinks or any National company.
Yesssssssssssss! You can't get a better testimonial about how bad a
company can be than if it's actually from the actions of the company
itself.

THANK  YOU BINKY!!!!!!!!!!!!