Re: Brinks Alarms: Beware of the Fuel Surcharge Tax

[tourman <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 30, 1:32 am, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Yeah, I know. It's always the same with you and your obsession. Poke
> and run.
> It's just suppose to be acceptable for you to make YOUR remarks and no
> one is supposed to respond ..... that about it?
>
> Not gonna happen .........
>
> Talk about someone not being able to see the obvious .............

RHC: The only "obvious" thing is that long term contracts that are not
paying down a reduced system cost are never in the client's best
interest; most definately are in the dealer's best interest; and are
something that consumers should be fighting to get rid of. The
"obvious" is that most in the industry don't see it that way because
it's not in their self interest to do so. The "obvious" is that this
has been kicked to death (by me) and I don't intend to keep this
thread going.

Something else that is "obvious" - nothing will change until consumers
force it to change and nothing you or I say about it will change
anything. So respond all you want, but it isn't going to change
anything either way..... that's why I intend drop  the matter.