Re: Brinks Alarms: Beware of the Fuel Surcharge Tax

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Jul 22, 6:13=EF=BF=BDpm, "Doug" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think the issue is that people are not =EF=BF=BDtelling the customer in=
 advance,
> so if =EF=BF=BDyou tell your customer =EF=BF=BDthe service call is $135.0=
0 for the first
> half hour plus a $5.00 fuel surcharge or even if you add $5.00 on and tel=
l
> them its $140.00 for the first half hour then its =EF=BF=BDOK. =EF=BF=BDW=
hat I believe the
> problem is when you tell someone its going to be $135.00 and then when yo=
u
> are finished you tack on a $5.00 fuel surcharge.
>
> Doug-

You mean, if I tell them that there's going to be a wire surcharge,
and a fuel surcharge, and a battery surcharge, and an employee wants a
raise surcharge, and my boat needs a new radar surcharge, etc, that
you think they'd pay them?  I mean, ...... as you say, as long as they
understand why and in advance ...... they shouldn't be upset.

Hey, NEAT! This could be a whole other untapped source of income!!!!!!