Re: Open Letter to Brinks over Tech-Man

["Charlesmurphy via HomeKB.com" <u35366@uwe>]

>
>Sigh... My opinions below again.  (Protected Free Speech.)
>
>They are attempting to deny me the right to a service I have paid
>for.  This
>is interferring with an enforceable agreement between Jim and myself.
>I
>paid a fee in exchange for access.  Overt acts in support of this
>agreement
>were performed by both parties and it is documentable.  Tortious
>interferrence does not necessarily have to result in direct personal
>gain by
>the third party.  They are deliberately and knowledgably attempting to
>deny
>me a service I have an enforceable agreement to use, have paid for,
>and they
>are causing me harm.  If it is found by the court (correctly) that
>Tech-Help
>does not contain actual "trade secrets" they have also done so under
>false
>pretenses.  Since I took the time to download and read all of the
>pages in
>the latest Tech-Help Beta with regard to Brinks I think they are just
>being
>pissy little prigs.  There is nothing there that can not be discovered
>by
>other legitimate sources.  The biggest obstacle is that the judge is
>being
>"educated" by Brink and not by Jim, and I would believe that the judge
>is
>likely to have a mild prejudice against Jim because of his initial
>"failure
>to appear" and his getting mad about them not allowing him to respond
>in the
>same manner as attorneys and others electronically.  (An error
>committed by
>the clerks which resulted in the failure to appear)  He could ask for
>a
>change of venue with cause if he felt the judge was acting in a
>prejudiced
>manner or he could ask for a change of venue without cause.
>
    I am not an alarm guy, just a consumer and I would not purchase from
Brinks nor would I give a recommendation to others to do so.  I can tell you
that as a typical resident of Oklahoma (on the Texas state line) that Texas
law is tough,  leverage in court goes to who and what you are.  The only way
to fight is to retain an attorney from that area.  If you use an attorney
from anywhere else, you will lose.  If you can get a change of venue, that
would be best.  Since Brinks is headquartered in Dallas Texas and Mr. Rojas
is not from there, the prejudice is already there.

--
Message posted via HomeKB.com
http://www.homekb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/security-alarms/200710/1