[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Open Letter to Brinks over Tech-Man



Good Take Bob!
I wonder if Ken Kirschenbaum would enjoy taking this one on?
Mike S


Bob La Londe wrote:
> My opinions follow.  (Protected Free Speech)
>
> Hmmm...  I wonder if we would all as dealers who subscribe to Jim's
> services have grounds for a tortious interrferrence lawsuit against
> Brinks.  After all they deliberately and willfully with knowledge and
> forethought interferred with ALL of the services Jim provides.  Based
> on the circumstances surrounding this deliberate and willful act I
> would infer malice as well, although that would be difficult to prove.
>
> As a paid subscriber to Jim's download services I feel that Brinks has
> attacked me and my business personally.  As I have never taken over a
> Brinks panel, handled a Brinks manual, or talked to a current Brinks
> customer that I am aware of I can only voice the opinion that this is
> a malicious and unprovoked attack against myself personally and my
> business.  .
>
> I know for a fact that Jim has specific permission to provide copies
> of many of the manuals on his site because we were all here putting
> pressure on many of those mfgs to continue to allow it a few years
> back.  I would assume that he has permission for all of his manuals
> provided except Brinks.
>
> Its my understanding that Brinks manuals have been removed (I have not
> checked as I have no interest in those archaic junk panels anyway) so
> they are now in my opinion deliberately trying to interfer by use of
> bullying tactics with the operations of other companies in which
> Brinks has no interest what so ever except possibly to disrupt the
> operations of
> competitors and benefit indirectly.  Pretty lame tactics at best, and
> downright illegal at worst.
>
> Bob La Londe
> I am not a sock puppet.
>
>


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home