Re: Open Letter to Brinks over Tech-Man

[Bob La Londe <alarm_wizard@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

My opinions follow.  (Protected Free Speech)

Hmmm...  I wonder if we would all as dealers who subscribe to Jim's
services have grounds for a tortious interrferrence lawsuit against
Brinks.  After all they deliberately and willfully with knowledge and
forethought interferred with ALL of the services Jim provides.  Based
on the circumstances surrounding this deliberate and willful act I
would infer malice as well, although that would be difficult to prove.

As a paid subscriber to Jim's download services I feel that Brinks has
attacked me and my business personally.  As I have never taken over a
Brinks panel, handled a Brinks manual, or talked to a current Brinks
customer that I am aware of I can only voice the opinion that this is
a malicious and unprovoked attack against myself personally and my
business.  .

I know for a fact that Jim has specific permission to provide copies
of many of the manuals on his site because we were all here putting
pressure on many of those mfgs to continue to allow it a few years
back.  I would assume that he has permission for all of his manuals
provided except Brinks.

Its my understanding that Brinks manuals have been removed (I have not
checked as I have no interest in those archaic junk panels anyway) so
they are now in my opinion deliberately trying to interfer by use of
bullying tactics with the operations of other companies in which
Brinks has no interest what so ever except possibly to disrupt the
operations of
competitors and benefit indirectly.  Pretty lame tactics at best, and
downright illegal at worst.

Bob La Londe
I am not a sock puppet.