[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open Letter to Brinks over Tech-Man
>> Not really. According to the law, they are simply enforcing their
>> own IP rights. We agree that their case is of questionable merit
>> but the effect on you of their enforcement action against Rojas is
>> between him and you -- not their problem. Here's an analogy.
>> Suppose Jiminex steals Leuck's bicycle and then contracts with you
>> to provide delivery service of your monthly billing. Leuck can't
>> get to work on time by walking through the Texas desert so he sues
>> Jiminex to get his bike back. In so doing Leuck stops you from
>> sending out your bills on time (no bike = no delivery), causing
>> you financial loss and preventing Jiminex from fulfilling his
>> contractual obligations to you.
>
> I would normally comment on this absurd comparison...
I thought it was pretty funny, but I agree that the idea of Jiminex
riding anything more complex than his rowboat at his advanced age
(the only advanced thing about him) is absurd.
> however I do realize you have far more experience with the law than
> I do
Since we're talking business law, that's true. I studied it for two
years in college. I still enjoy studying case law. Also, I actually
understand the principles involved which sets us apart even further
(not that I mind).
--
Regards,
Robert L Bass
=============================>
Bass Home Electronics
941-925-8650
4883 Fallcrest Circle
Sarasota · Florida · 34233
http://www.bassburglaralarms.com
=============================>
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home