Re: Open Letter to Brinks over Tech-Man

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DYLPi.692$fm1.146@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Not really.  According to the law, they are simply enforcing their
> own IP rights.  We agree that their case is of questionable merit but
> the effect on you of their enforcement action against Rojas is
> between him and you -- not their problem.  Here's an analogy.
> Suppose Jiminex steals Leuck's bicycle and then contracts with you to
> provide delivery service of your monthly billing.  Leuck can't get to
> work on time by walking through the Texas desert so he sues Jiminex
> to get his bike back.  In so doing Leuck stops you from sending out
> your bills on time (no bike = no delivery), causing you financial
> loss and preventing Jiminex from fulfilling his contractual
> obligations to you.

I would normally comment on this absurd comparison however I do realize you
have far more experience with the law than I do