[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: home alarm systems are for sissys

Subject: Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
From: "Nathan W. Collier" <no@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 21:05:42 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1193928893.406565.198450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1193936994.891233.216270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <472a2c10.6664796@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1193949610.284687.220910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1194055799.690950.179010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1194055799.690950.179010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> This is just the latest. I've got a document somewhere in my computer
> dated 1966, I think, where the UN was trying to limit the ownership of
> small arms ...... even back then.

.....isnt civilian disarmament a specific goal listed in the UN charter?

--
Nathan In Montana
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
http://1911Talk.com
http://HiPowerTalk.com
http://GlockCarry.com
http://p99sw99.com
http://PPStalk.com
http://P7talk.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
  - From: Roland Moore

References:
- home alarm systems are for sissys
  - From: datalines@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
  - From: tourman
- Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
  - From: Beachcomber
- Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
  - From: tourman
- Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
  - From: Jim

Prev by Message: Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
Next by Message: Re: The latest Brinkle in my life
Previous by thread: Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
Next by thread: Re: home alarm systems are for sissys
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home