Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

be careful what you say here




"George Siegle" <gsiegle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MArli.34913$Io4.18804@xxxxxxxxxxx
|I have printed the Documents, Thank You.
|
| When I show them on sales calls to people who have gotten a quote or
talked
| to Brinks it put an end to them wanted to deal with Brinks.
|
| End users do not like the idea of having an alarm in their home that if
they
| sell the home it has no value to the resell of the home if it is not part
of
| the home and can not be used by the new owner unless they sign a contract
| with Brinks.
|
| Thanks Brinks for the help, and good luck Jim.
|
| George Siegle
|
|
| "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:46958a78$0$8006$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > Multi billion dollar corporation feels financially threatened by a small
| > online alarm business located in Tampa, Florida.
| >
| > Read all about it.
| >
| >
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-txndce/case_no-3:2007cv00437/case_id-165443/
| >
| > The court documents are all available for public viewing:
| >
| > http://www.tech-man.com/brinks.asp
| >
| > Jim Rojas
|
|