Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas

["George Siegle" <gsiegle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have printed the Documents, Thank You.

When I show them on sales calls to people who have gotten a quote or talked
to Brinks it put an end to them wanted to deal with Brinks.

End users do not like the idea of having an alarm in their home that if they
sell the home it has no value to the resell of the home if it is not part of
the home and can not be used by the new owner unless they sign a contract
with Brinks.

Thanks Brinks for the help, and good luck Jim.

George Siegle


"Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46958a78$0$8006$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Multi billion dollar corporation feels financially threatened by a small
> online alarm business located in Tampa, Florida.
>
> Read all about it.
>
> http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-txndce/case_no-3:2007cv00437/case_id-165443/
>
> The court documents are all available for public viewing:
>
> http://www.tech-man.com/brinks.asp
>
> Jim Rojas