[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas



Brinks relies heavily on consumer ignorance. We live in a time where all
that has changed, where information on any topic is readily available
with a mouse click. An informed consumer can be your best customer.

Good luck on your future sales.

Jim Rojas




George Siegle wrote:
> I have printed the Documents, Thank You.
>
> When I show them on sales calls to people who have gotten a quote or talked
> to Brinks it put an end to them wanted to deal with Brinks.
>
> End users do not like the idea of having an alarm in their home that if they
> sell the home it has no value to the resell of the home if it is not part of
> the home and can not be used by the new owner unless they sign a contract
> with Brinks.
>
> Thanks Brinks for the help, and good luck Jim.
>
> George Siegle
>
>
> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:46958a78$0$8006$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Multi billion dollar corporation feels financially threatened by a small
>> online alarm business located in Tampa, Florida.
>>
>> Read all about it.
>>
>> http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-txndce/case_no-3:2007cv00437/case_id-165443/
>>
>> The court documents are all available for public viewing:
>>
>> http://www.tech-man.com/brinks.asp
>>
>> Jim Rojas
>
>


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home