Re: Brinks Home Security v Jim Rojas

[Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mr Sablemann,

Your reply to my motion just proves my point on how pathetic Brink's
position really is...you can quote me on this if you like. You Mr
Sablemann are a waste of human life. You would probably do better
chasing ambulances. Your client is a huge eye sore in the alarm
industry. Your client should just stick to transporting money. Your
client has no idea what real security means. 3 doors and a motion
detector for $99 is not security, it is a false sense of one.

I laugh at you.

Jim Rojas

Crash Gordon wrote:
> be careful what you say here
>
>
>
>
> "George Siegle" <gsiegle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:MArli.34913$Io4.18804@xxxxxxxxxxx
> |I have printed the Documents, Thank You.
> |
> | When I show them on sales calls to people who have gotten a quote or
> talked
> | to Brinks it put an end to them wanted to deal with Brinks.
> |
> | End users do not like the idea of having an alarm in their home that if
> they
> | sell the home it has no value to the resell of the home if it is not part
> of
> | the home and can not be used by the new owner unless they sign a contract
> | with Brinks.
> |
> | Thanks Brinks for the help, and good luck Jim.
> |
> | George Siegle
> |
> |
> | "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | news:46958a78$0$8006$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > Multi billion dollar corporation feels financially threatened by a small
> | > online alarm business located in Tampa, Florida.
> | >
> | > Read all about it.
> | >
> | >
> http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-txndce/case_no-3:2007cv00437/case_id-165443/
> | >
> | > The court documents are all available for public viewing:
> | >
> | > http://www.tech-man.com/brinks.asp
> | >
> | > Jim Rojas
> |
> |
>
>