Re: Quality Ademco Engineering

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Seccon1" <seccon1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8uWUh.1027$PA6.1012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Amazing what short memories exist here,
> about 8 or 9 years ago in this group when I responded to the Clock issue
on
> the Z1100 and got chewed out there was plenty of attitude to go around.
>
> I don't write every nite as many here do and as I have stated in the past
> many of the answers that are posted are accurate so when the point is
made,
> I see no reason to go on and on.
>
> Furthermore, I  don't dig up personal crap on fellow posters as I have
seen
> done here for years. Sometimes, I do get good feedback from this group and
I
> have passed it on to whomever I worked for at the time whether it was Wade
> Moose, David Steele, (Moose Products), Ken Boyda (Sentrol then Interlogix)
> or now with the product managers of Honeywell.
>
> As to coping an attitude, well when you see erroneous information posted
> about your company (Nomen's post that we do not notify folks about
> compatibility) well it just flipped a switch.
> and when someone gave their opinion that our organization essentially
causes
> the problem. I simply gave an opinion.
>
> Seems like years ago I contributed copies of the Scantronic Products to
the
> Library Jim,
> Seems like I also wrote a letter years ago when Ademco wanted to stop the
> distribution of Ademco manuals on Tech Man
>
> Don't remember anyone not wanting my input then.
>
> So, Can anyone complain and Lie here or is some special requirement
needed?

You expect us to remember 8 or 9 years ago when most here can't remember
what they did last week?