[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: share account #



"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176780666.562270.23580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Apr 12, 11:59?pm, Nick Lawrence <n...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > One problem this method (below) will encounter is when receivers &
> > automation systems track caller-id for incoming calls,
> > and encounter caller-id mismatch events. Will cause confusion in the
> > station.
> >
> >
> >
> My central is aware of the installation and they've somehow "linked"
> the numbers the accounts call in on.
>
> This was an account that was "switched" from another central so they
> "ok'd" it when I explained how it was set up, how old the account was
> and therefore the reason it was done that way. If they had a problem
> with it, I would have changed it.

Then why the "you wouldn't know cost savings" speech you just gave me? Had
you said this from the start it would be another story




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home