[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: share account #



On Apr 16, 11:16?pm, "Mark Leuck" <m..le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Jim" <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:1176780666.562270.23580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > On Apr 12, 11:59?pm, Nick Lawrence <n...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > One problem this method (below) will encounter is when receivers &
> > > automation systems track caller-id for incoming calls,
> > > and encounter caller-id mismatch events. Will cause confusion in the
> > > station.
>
> > My central is aware of the installation and they've somehow "linked"
> > the numbers the accounts call in on.
>
> > This was an account that was "switched" from another central so they
> > "ok'd" it when I explained how it was set up, how old the account was
> > and therefore the reason it was done that way. If they had a problem
> > with it, I would have changed it.
>
> Then why the "you wouldn't know cost savings" speech you just gave me? Had
> you said this from the start it would be another story

Well, I wasn't aware that I needed to make sure you approved of it
before I did something.

Next time just assume I said fuck you, before you raise a question
about what I do and don't do, so that you don't have to waste time
posting.



alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home